Documented Asbestos Litigation
According to publicly filed asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Enpro Industries has been named as a defendant in 200+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2008 and 2026 — concentrated in the federal asbestos multidistrict litigation (In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, E.D. Pennsylvania) and other U.S. district courts. Enpro Industries is named in these cases as a corporate successor entity: Garlock Sealing Technologies (asbestos gaskets/packing) and Anchor Packing, held via subsidiary Coltec Industries. The asbestos claims arise from products made by the predecessor company rather than by Enpro Industries under its current name.
Companies Frequently Named Alongside Enpro Industries
In these publicly filed cases, Enpro Industries is most often named as a co-defendant alongside General Electric, CBS, Borg Warner, IMO Industries, Union Carbide, Crane Co., Eaton, Georgia-Pacific — reflecting the multi-defendant nature of asbestos litigation, in which plaintiffs name the range of companies connected to their exposure history.
Occupational Exposure and Asbestos Disease
Asbestos exposure is associated with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, typically after a latency period of two to five decades. Workers in industrial trades — maintenance, construction, shipyard, power generation, and manufacturing — are among those most frequently represented in asbestos litigation.
Legal Status and Litigation History
The litigation record above reflects allegations from publicly filed asbestos cases; these are plaintiff allegations, not findings of fact, and liability is determined case by case. An attorney experienced in asbestos litigation can evaluate whether a specific work and exposure history supports a claim involving Enpro Industries.