Documented Asbestos Litigation

According to publicly filed asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Schneider Electric has been named as a defendant in 200+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2001 and 2022 — concentrated in the federal asbestos multidistrict litigation (In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, E.D. Pennsylvania) and other U.S. district courts. Schneider Electric is named in these cases as a corporate successor entity: Square D Company — Schneider acquired Square D in 1991 and is sued for Square D’s asbestos-containing electrical components (arc chutes, asbestos-filled phenolic molding compound). The asbestos claims arise from products made by the predecessor company rather than by Schneider Electric under its current name.

Companies Frequently Named Alongside Schneider Electric

In these publicly filed cases, Schneider Electric is most often named as a co-defendant alongside General Electric, IMO Industries, Honeywell International, Eaton, Union Carbide, Crane Co., Warren Pumps, CBS — reflecting the multi-defendant nature of asbestos litigation, in which plaintiffs name the range of companies connected to their exposure history.

Occupational Exposure and Asbestos Disease

Asbestos exposure is associated with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, typically after a latency period of two to five decades. Workers in industrial trades — maintenance, construction, shipyard, power generation, and manufacturing — are among those most frequently represented in asbestos litigation.

The litigation record above reflects allegations from publicly filed asbestos cases; these are plaintiff allegations, not findings of fact, and liability is determined case by case. An attorney experienced in asbestos litigation can evaluate whether a specific work and exposure history supports a claim involving Schneider Electric.